What playing and training for all 7 days does

I’m on court or in the gym seven days a week now (two days of intense coaching, three days of regular play at the academy, and two days of fitness). Coaching means a coach watching every shot I hit and correcting it, academy play means points and matches against the other players at the academy where I train, and fitness means the gym, for strength, power and endurance. I close each of the fitness days out with twenty minutes of loose, relaxed hitting, just so my hands don’t forget what a racket feels like.

Seven days a week sounds like a burnout story about to happen, but it isn’t one. Six months in, I’m faster, stronger, and a genuine pain to put away in a long rally, more than I ever was on the lighter weeks I used to train. A rally is the run of shots between the serve and the end of the point, and to put a ball away is to hit the shot that ends it. This is about what seven days, done this particular way, actually give me.

---

Table of contents

1. Coaching: reflexes that skip the thinking part entirely
2. Academy play: footwork, and reading a rally that’s actually alive
3. Fitness: the strength and endurance the long points actually need
4. Why all three together do something none of them manage alone
5. The part that isn’t on a court at all
6. What six months of this looks like, in practice

---

Coaching: reflexes that skip the thinking part entirely

The coaching sessions are the hardest part of my week, and what makes them hard is what’s getting rebuilt, not the volume. A coach watches every single rep, hence the serve toss, the split-step, and the recovery step back to the middle are all under correction at once. The toss is the throw of the ball up before a serve. The split-step is the small hop you land from just as the other player hits the ball, so that you can push off in either direction. The recovery step is the step back towards the middle of the court after every shot, so that the next ball is within reach. That’s a completely different kind of tired than just hitting a lot of balls for an hour.

Underneath all that correction, what’s actually being trained is reaction speed. A decent coach can put a ball exactly where I’m weak, on timing I can’t predict, and my body has to answer before my brain has even caught up with what happened, which is the whole point. A reaction that needs a decision first is already too slow - by the time I’ve thought “forehand, cross-court” (a forehand hit diagonally across the court), the ball’s gone past me. A couple of sessions a week of that kind of deliberately awkward, unpredictable feed (a feed is a ball the coach sends me on purpose, to a chosen spot at a chosen pace) is what turns “thinking fast” into “not thinking at all.” That’s a real change in what my nervous system is doing, and not just a confidence thing. The signal from the eye to the feet has stopped waiting for a decision on the way.

Academy play: footwork, and reading a rally that’s actually alive

Academy play is where the coaching gets tested against something no drill can fake - another person who genuinely wants to win too. Playing live points (points played against a real opponent, rather than balls fed by a coach) has surprisingly little to do with hitting the ball cleanly in isolation. It’s mostly about getting to the ball at all, which is a footwork problem well before it’s ever a stroke problem.

What repeated match play builds is efficient movement, which is basically the difference between covering the width of a court and merely running across it. By that I mean a split-step timed off the opponent’s contact (the moment their racket meets the ball) instead of my own guess at when the ball’s coming, a recovery step taken while the last shot is still in the air, and changing direction hard without losing my balance halfway through it. None of that shows up against a coach feeding predictable balls, only against someone actively trying to move me out of position. It takes a real amount of repetition before it stops feeling effortful and just starts happening on its own.

Fitness: the strength and endurance the long points actually need

On paper, the two fitness days look like the ones furthest away from tennis, but in practice everything else depends on them. Explosive power, which means the strength to push off hard in a split second, is what makes the split-step and the direction changes possible in the first place - a body that can’t generate force quickly just doesn’t move quickly, no matter how sharp the reaction is. Strength work keeps a serve or a groundstroke (a forehand or backhand hit after the ball has bounced) from falling apart late in a match, once fatigue starts eating into technique. The endurance training is aimed squarely at the rallies I used to lose (the long ones, past ball ten or twelve, meaning the tenth or twelfth shot of the point), where the point stops being about skill and turns into a question of who tires first.

The twenty minutes of easy hitting at the end isn’t filler. After a whole day in the gym, my body needs to remember what contact actually feels like before the next coaching session starts cold. It’s a small thing, but it keeps the feel of the ball in my hands through the two fitness days.

Why all three together do something none of them manage alone

None of the three (reaction speed, movement quality, and physical capacity) really means much on its own, and that’s the actual case for training this way rather than any other. Reflexes without footwork just get you to the wrong spot on time. Footwork without strength and endurance is quick for the first few rallies of a set (a set is the first to six games, and the unit a match is counted in), then slow and late for the rest of it.

Each part trains something the other two need and don’t supply on their own, which is a different kind of argument than “some days are hard, some days are rest.” Coaching sharpens a reflex that would go to waste if the body couldn’t get there fast enough. Match play grooves footwork that would collapse the moment fatigue kicked in if there weren’t an endurance base holding it up, and fitness work builds raw capacity that would sit around unused without live matches to actually demand it. There’s no rest day in this week at all. There doesn’t need to be one, because no two days back to back ask the same system to do the same job twice.

The part that isn’t on a court at all

None of the above works without something underneath it that has nothing to do with a racket or a gym. Seven days a week of this only holds up because of what happens outside the training (eating, drinking, and sleeping). I used to treat all three as background noise, whereas they’re closer to a fourth training day that just doesn’t look like one.

Food is the biggest lever. I eat plenty of fruit, plenty of vegetables, and a genuinely balanced diet, and I stay off junk food and fast food as strictly as I can manage. I do it because I’ve noticed directly how much worse a coaching session feels the morning after a bad meal than after a good one, not because of some strict diet plan I’m following. The body doing all this work needs to be fed properly, and cheap fuel shows up almost immediately as a flatter, slower version of me on court.

I drink water and tender coconut constantly (tender coconut is the young green coconut, drunk for its water). With two fitness days and five days of hard tennis in the heat, dehydration is the easiest way to sabotage a week that’s otherwise going well, and it’s entirely avoidable. Tender coconut in particular has become a habit rather than a treat, and it’s part of how the week runs now.

I sleep eight to nine hours most nights, which is non-negotiable and probably the single most underrated part of the entire schedule. The reflex work from coaching, the footwork getting grooved on academy days, and the strength and endurance from fitness don’t actually consolidate without proper sleep. Consolidate means settle in. The muscle repairs itself while I’m asleep and the day’s practice gets filed away, which is why a skill learnt in the evening comes back measurably quicker the next morning after a night’s sleep, and the same hours spent awake give nothing. It’s less “rest” and more where the actual adaptation happens. If I skip it, I’m just accumulating fatigue on top of fatigue, no matter how well-structured the other three activities are.

What six months of this looks like, in practice

The clearest change shows up in long rallies, the twelve-, fifteen-, twenty-ball points that used to be exactly where I’d lose ground. Those are now the points I’m most likely to win, and the length is the reason. By around ball fifteen, the endurance work is what’s keeping my legs under me, and the footwork is still getting me to shots I would have been half a step late to a year ago.

The second change is quieter and harder to point at directly. The game feels less effortful at a given intensity than it used to, which is only a fancier way of saying that my reflexes and movement have gone from deliberate to automatic. I spend less of a match consciously thinking about the split-step and more of it just doing one, on time, without really noticing I did.

All of this happened because the week stopped being one demand, repeated seven times, and became three genuinely different things instead, each one depending on what the other two build, with none of it wasted. It did not come from stumbling on some perfect ratio of hard days to easy ones, or from bolting on a rest day. None of the three would hold up for long without the food, the water, and the sleep underneath them.